Disposed

A.Ramasamy v. the Registrar General

Madras HC24 Jul 2017WP(MD)/17484/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a retired Sheristadar seeking step up in pay on par with a junior officer. The court directed the fourth respondent, Home Department, to pass appropriate orders on the records within eight weeks. The petition was disposed of with this direction.

What did the court decide?

Directed fourth respondent to pass appropriate orders within eight weeks from receipt of copy of this order.

A.Ramasamy Vs the Registrar General — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 24.07.2017

¶4

CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

W.P(MD)No.17484 of 2014

¶6

A.Ramasamy ...Petitioner

¶7

-vs-

¶8

1.The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104.

¶9

2.The Registrar, (Administration), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai-23.

¶10

3.The Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram District Court, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. ...Respondents (R4 is suo motu impleaded vide Court Order dated 24.10.2016 in W.P.(MD)No.17484/14 by this Court)

¶11

Prayer : This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to issue necessary orders that the pay of the petitioner has to be stepped up on par with his Junior Mr.S.Sivanandam as proposed in the letter of the Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram dated 31.01.2011 that his pay to Rs.1940+P.P.91/- with effect from 06.09.1993.

¶12

For Petitioner :Mr.A.John Vincent For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha For 4^th Respondent : Mr.M.Murugan, Government Advocate. *****

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

¶15

(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J)

¶16

The petitioner being a retired Sheristadar seeks stepping up of his pay.

¶17

2.From the records, it appear that two communications have been sent by the fourth respondent. On receipt of the last of the communication from the fourth respondent in Government Letter No.79817/Cts.V/2014-7, dated 26.12.2016, the second respondent has sent the communication furnishing all the particulars in R.O.C.No.894/2007/C2/MB dated 11.04.2017. Thus, it is for the fourth respondent to pass appropriate orders on the same.

¶18

3.In such view of the matter, we direct the fourth respondent to pass appropriate orders, pursuant to the communication dated 11.04.2017, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

4.This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

¶20

Sd /-

¶21

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(RECORDS)

¶22

/TRUE COPY/

¶23

SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶24

To:

¶25

1.The Registrar General, High Court of Madras,Chennai-104.

¶26

2.The Registrar, (Administration), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai-23.

¶27

3.The Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram District Court, Ramanathapuram.

¶28

4.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts) Department,Secretariat, Chennai-9.

¶29

+1 CC TO MR.A.JOHN VINCENT, ADVOCATE,SR NO.67094

¶30

+1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR NO.67635

¶31

MYR/rmi

¶32

MAS/SKN-RSK/SAR1:01.08.2017:2P-7C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

W.P(MD)No.17484 of 2014 24.07.2017

A.Ramasamy v. the Registrar General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Ramasamy v. the Registrar General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.K.Sankar Vs State of Tamil Nadu

S.Karuppiah, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

K.Vijayarani Vs the Superintendent of Police

Subbaiah Vs the Inspector of Police

Sreejith Vs the Superintendent of Police

Prejith @ Suresh Vs the Principal Secretary to