Disposed

S. Noorul Minhaj, v. the Director

Madras HC18 Aug 2016WP(MD)/3814/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench disposed of a writ petition seeking issuance of original educational certificates. The court ordered the return of certificates produced during hearing to be reissued only after the petitioner pays fixed damages of Rs. 33,000 via demand draft.

What did the court decide?

Directing the 2nd Respondent to hand over the original certificates to the petitioner only upon receipt of a Demand Draft for Rs. 33,000/-.

S. Noorul Minhaj, Vs the Director — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2016 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR W.P(MD)No.3814 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015

¶3

S.Noorul Minhaj .. Petitioner

¶4

Vs.

¶5

1.The Director,

¶6

Tamil Nadu Teacher Training Institute, Chennai – 600 016.

¶7

2.The Principal, Thiravium Teacher Training Institute, Kailasapatti, Thamaraikulam (P.O.), Theni. .. Respondents

¶8

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to issue all the original certificate of the petitioner such as 10th & 12th mark statement, community certificate, transfer certificate and course completion certificate in respect of B.Ed., within the period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohamed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondent 1 : Mr.Aayiram K. Selvakumar

¶10

Government Advocate For Respondent 2 : Mr.S.Alagusundar

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue all the original certificate of the petitioner such as 10th & 12th mark statement, community certificate, transfer certificate and course completion certificate in respect of B.Ed., within the period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

¶13

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel for the second respondent.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned counsel for the second respondent has produced the following original certificates of the petitioner, namely, 1) Transfer Certificate (DTE), 2)10^th Mark Sheet, 3)12^th

¶15

¶16

Mark Sheet, 4)Community Certificate, 5)Nativity Certificate, 6) D.EI.Ed I year Mark sheet (2 – two) and 7)D.EI.Ed II year Mark Sheet (1-One).

¶17

4.By order dated 05.08.2016, this Court has also directed the petitioner to bring a Demand Draft for a sum of Rs.33,000/- (Rupees thirty three thousand only) which was agreed to be paid to the second respondent. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.H.Mohamed Imran, represents that due to unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner is not present today. However, the learned counsel undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that the amount namely a sum of Rs.33,000/- will be directly paid to the second respondent namely the Principal, Thiravium Teacher Training Institute, Kailasapatti, Thamaraikulam (P.O.), Theni, on or before 22.08.2016.

¶18

5.Since the petitioner has not turned up today and has not produced the Demand Draft in terms of the order passed by this Court on 05.08.2016, the certificates produced before this Court by the second respondent is returned to him to make it available with the second respondent so as to enable him to hand over the same to the petitioner himself directly upon receipt of the Demand Draft for a sum of Rs.33,000/- (Rupees Thirty three thousand only) drawn in favour of the second respondent.

¶19

6.The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(Record)

¶22

/True copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

1.The Director,

¶26

Tamil Nadu Teacher Training Institute, Chennai – 600 016.

¶27

2.The Principal,

¶28

Thiravium Teacher Training Institute,

¶29

Kailasapatti, Thamaraikulam (P.O.), Theni.

¶30

+1 cc to M/s.Ajmal Associates, Advocate in SR.No.45731

¶31

+1 cc to M/s.S.Alagusundar, Advocate in SR.No.45552

¶32

SRM

¶33

CSL/CK/02.09.2016 :2P/5C

¶34

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.3814 of 2015 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2015

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

¶37

18.08.2016

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Noorul Minhaj, v. the Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Noorul Minhaj, v. the Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Uma Maheswari Vs the Secretary to Govt.

K.Subramanian Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

K.Gopinath Vs the Revenue Divisional

R.Thirumalai Vs the Director General of

R.Mohan, Vs Duraisekaran

Parameswaran Pillai (Died) Vs Chellammal