Dismissed

U.Lathakumari, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC16 Mar 2016WP/9827/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the respondent to receive their applications dated 01.02.2016 for Autorickshaw permits in Form CCPA. The court directed the respondent to receive the applications and consider them on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to receive the applications of 01.02.2016 and consider them on merits within six weeks.

U.Lathakumari, Vs The Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 16.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.9827 to 9832 of 2016

¶6

U.Lathakumari ... Petitioner in W.P.9827 of 2016 A.Arun ... Petitioner in W.P.9828 of 2016 H.Prabukumar ... Petitioner in W.P.9829 of 2016 M.Laxmi ... Petitioner in W.P.9830 of 2016 Jayasankar ... Petitioner in W.P.9831 of 2016 P.Velumani ... Petitioner in W.P.9832 of 2016 Vs.

¶7

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North, Chennai. ... Respondent in W.Ps.9827 to 9829/2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North-East, Chennai. ... Respondent in W.Ps.9830 to 9832/2016

¶8

Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 01.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hariharan (in all W.Ps)

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.A.Zakir Hussain, (in all W.Ps) Government Advocate

¶11

The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 01.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶12

2.Mr.A.Zakir Hussain, learned Government Advocate taking notice for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

3.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 01.02.2016 in Form-CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

4.With this observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶15

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
va
To
1.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai North,
Chennai.
2.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai North-East,
Chennai.
+ 6 ccs to Mr.K.Hariharan, Advocate Sr.16561
W.P.Nos.9827 to 9832 of 2016
JSV(CO)
EU 17.03.16

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

U.Lathakumari, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

U.Lathakumari, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tvl.Siemens Ltd, Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax

M/s. Premier Optical Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Kannappan Iron and Steel Vs The Assistant Commissioner

J.Rebecca Vs The Regional Transport Officer

E.Narayanan, Vs The Transport Commissioner

M/s.Guru Raghavendra Vs The Commercial Tax Officer