This order directs the Regional Transport Officer to receive and consider applications dated 02.02.2016 in Form CCPA along with prescribed fees granted to petitioner for autorickshaw permits within six weeks of the order.
Direction to receive applications and consider them on merits within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.03.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.Nos.9799 to 9813 of 2016
E.Narayanan ... Petitioner in W.P.9799 of 2016 S.Lakshmanan ... Petitioner in W.P.9800 of 2016 S.Arivalagan ... Petitioner in W.P.9801 of 2016 G.Saravanan ... Petitioner in W.P.9802 of 2016 M.Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.9803 of 2016 S.Golda Santhi ... Petitioner in W.P.9804 of 2016 R.Violet ... Petitioner in W.P.9805 of 2016 U.Mahesh ... Petitioner in W.P.9806 of 2016 G.Sri Ramu ... Petitioner in W.P.9807 of 2016 T.Shanmugam ... Petitioner in W.P.9808 of 2016 T.Kannan ... Petitioner in W.P.9809 of 2016 M.Manikandan ... Petitioner in W.P.9810 of 2016 S.Narayanasamy ... Petitioner in W.P.9811 of 2016 B.Nasreen ... Petitioner in W.P.9812 of 2016 K.Venkatesan ... Petitioner in W.P.9813 of 2016 Vs. 1.The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. ... 1st Respondent in all W.Ps. 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (North), Chennai. ... 2nd Respondent in W.Ps.9799, 9807/2016 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-Central, Chennai. ... 2nd Respondent in W.Ps.9800, 9803, 9806/2016 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South-West, Chennai. ... 2nd Respondent in W.P.9801/2016 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Shozhinganallur, Chennai. ... 2nd Respondent in W.P.9802/2016 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South-East, Chennai. ... 2nd Respondent in
Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 02.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.
The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue writ of mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 02.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.
2.Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan, learned Special Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law.
3.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 02.02.2016 in Form-CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4.With this observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Transport Commissioner,
State Transport Authority,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai (North), Chennai.
3.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-Central, Chennai.
4.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai South-West, Chennai.
5.The Regional Transport Officer,
Shozhinganallur, Chennai.
6.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai South-East, Chennai.
7.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai East, Chennai.
8.The Regional Transport Officer,
Tambaram, Chennai.
9.The Regional Transport Officer,
Poonamallee, Chennai.
W.P.Nos.9799 to 9813 of 2016
kk(CO) srg(17/03/2016)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner is entitled to a direction to receive and consider his application for the grant of an Autorickshaw permit.
E. Narayanan
S. Lakshmanan
S. Arivalagan
G. Saravanan
M. Kumar
S. Golda Santhi
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
