Allowed

J.Rebecca v. The Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC16 Mar 2016WP/9816/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In these writ petitions, the Madras High Court directed the Regional Transport Officer to accept applications for Autorickshaw permits filed on 16.02.2016. The court ordered the authority to consider the applications on merits within six weeks without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to receive applications dated 16.02.2016 for Autorickshaw permits and the prescribed fee; to consider them on merits within six weeks.

J.Rebecca Vs The Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.9816 to 9825 of 2016

¶6

J.Rebecca ... Petitioner in W.P.9816 of 2016 D.Deepa ... Petitioner in W.P.9817 of 2016 K.Kasthuri ... Petitioner in W.P.9818 of 2016 S.Poongodi ... Petitioner in W.P.9819 of 2016 S.Sivakami ... Petitioner in W.P.9820 of 2016 K.Komadhi Sarala ... Petitioner in W.P.9821 of 2016 N.Muniammal ... Petitioner in W.P.9822 of 2016 V.Muthu ... Petitioner in W.P.9823 of 2016 B.Jennath Begum ... Petitioner in W.P.9824 of 2016 S.Raviperumal ... Petitioner in W.P.9825 of 2016

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee, Chennai. ... Respondent in W.Ps.

¶9

Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of

¶10

India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent herein to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 16.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Kesavan (in all W.Ps)

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.A.Raja Perumal, (in all W.Ps) Government Advocate

¶13

The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 16.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶14

2.Mr.A.Raja Perumal, learned Government Advocate taking notice for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

3.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 16.02.2016 in Form-CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

4.With this observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed

¶17

of. No costs.

¶18

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
va
To
The Regional Transport Officer,
Poonamallee,
Chennai.
+10cc's to Mr.B.Kesavan, Advocate, S.R.No.16560
W.P.Nos.9816 to 9825 of 2016
KK(CO)
CA(17/03/2016)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J.Rebecca v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Rebecca v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tvl.Siemens Ltd, Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax

M/s. Premier Optical Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Kannappan Iron and Steel Vs The Assistant Commissioner

U.Lathakumari, Vs The Regional Transport Officer

E.Narayanan, Vs The Transport Commissioner

M/s.Guru Raghavendra Vs The Commercial Tax Officer