The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging an order rejecting an appeal under the Chit Funds Act, 1982. The Court dismissed the petition after the second respondent withdrew the proceeding against the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.12.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.1917 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
K.Damodharan .. Petitioner
vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep.
by its Secretary to the Government,
Commercial Taxes and
Registration Department,
Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the first respondent made in Lr.No.18159/G/2010-1 dated 7.12.2010 and quash the same and consequently allow the petitioner's application to condone the delay and direct the first respondent to hear petitioner's appeal on merits and in accordance with law.
For petitioner : Mr.Boothaswamy
for M/s.Selvi George
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition to quash the order passed by the first respondent made in Lr.No.18159/G/2010-1 dated 7.12.2010 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner under section 70 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 filed against the award passed by the Arbitrator
of Chits, North and South Chennai in ARC No.269/2009 has been rejected.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the rejection of an appeal under the Chit Funds Act, 1982 should be allowed when the second respondent has decided to withdraw the proceeding against the petition
K.Damodharan
The State of Tamil Nadu
M/s. Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu (P) Ltd.
D. Krishnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
