Petitioner sought mandamus for interview call for a Safaiwala post. Court dismissed petition as infructuous due to endorsement by petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.12.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNA KUMAR
W.P.No.6514 of 2011
and M.P.No.1 of 2011
S.Vaithiyanathan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. Government of India,
rep. by its Secretary,
Ministry of Defence,
South Block, New Delhi.
2. Wellington Cantonment Board,
rep. by its Chief Executive Officer,
Wellington,
The Nilgiris – 643 232. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus
directing the respondents to call the petitioner for the
interview to the post of Safaiwala as per the advertisement
dated 9.9.2009 issued by the second respondent in “Dinakaran”
Tamil Daily subsequently in Employment News dated 10-16 October,
2009.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Elango For 2nd respondent : Mr.M.Vijayan for M/s.King & Partridge For 1st respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that this Writ Petition has become infructuous, the Writ Petition is dismissed as such. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
asvm
To
1. The Secretary,
Government of India,
Ministry of Defence,
South Block, New Delhi.
2. The Chief Executive Officer,
Wellington Cantonment Board,
Wellington,
The Nilgiris – 643 232.
+1cc to M/s.King & Partridge, Advocate, S.R.No.72365
W.P.No.6514 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
PVS(CO)
CA(05/01/2017)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Vaithiyanathan
Government of India
Wellington Cantonment Board
D. Krishna Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
