R.Srinivasan, v. Government of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition filed seeking an interview for a recruit post was dismissed as infructuous due to the petitioner's endorsement stating that the petition has become infructuous. No substantive legal proposition is formulated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.12.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNA KUMAR
W.P.No.6512 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
R.Srinivasan ... Petitioner
Vs. 1. Government of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi.
- Wellington Cantonment Board, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Wellington, The Nilgiris – 643 232. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to call the petitioner for the interview to the post of Safaiwala as per the advertisement dated 9.9.2009 issued by the second respondent in “Dinakaran” Tamil Daily subsequently in Employment News dated 10-16 October, 2009.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Srinivasan
- respondent
Government of India
- respondent
Wellington Cantonment Board
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court