Allowed

G.Semban, v. The Managing Director

Madras HC11 Jul 2016WP/14841/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus directing the transport corporation to settle unpaid retirement benefits. The single-judge bench directed the discharge of terminal benefits in twelve equal monthly instalments, effective from October 2016, following a common judgment.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to disburse terminal benefits in twelve equal monthly instalments starting 01.10.2016.

G.Semban, Vs The Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 11.07.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

W.P.No. 14841 of 2016

¶6

D. Semban .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. No.12, Ramakrishna Road Salem-636 007

¶9

The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai Chennai – 600 002. .. Respondents

¶10

Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle all the terminal benefits due and payable to the petitioner with interest at 12% per annum with effect from 01.05.2015 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.A Selvaraju

¶12

The petitioner joined the services of the Transport Corporation and he retired from service long before. The grievance of the petitioner is that though, he retired from service long before, till date, he was not paid with the retirement benefits. In this regard, the petitioner submitted representations before the respondent, on various dates.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

However, till date, there was no response. Aggrieved against the same, the present Writ Petition was filed.

¶15

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, brought to the notice of this Court the common judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Madurai Bench of this Court in W.A. (MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015, wherein under similar circumstances, the Transport Corporation undertook to pay the amount due and payable to the petitioners therein in twelve equal monthly instalments. He would further submit that following the same, this Court has passed similar orders in several Writ Petitions. Accordingly, he would pray that a similar order may be passed in this Writ Petition also.

¶16

Mr. Paramasivadoss, learned Counsel representing the respondents, who would affirm that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the judgment passed by the Madurai Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015 and the relevant portion of the said judgment reads as follows:-

¶17

“2. The said statement is thus taken on records and the respondents will be bound by the same. We have to keep in mind the judicial pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in D.D.Tewari (D)through LRS. Vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd and Others (2014 (9) SCALE -78), wherein it is held that in case of any delay in making the payment of the instalments, the interest payable would become 18% p.a., for the delayed period apart from any other remedy which may be available to the appellants for non-compliance of undertaking given to this Court.

¶18

The instalments to be paid from July 2015 and each instalments should be paid on or before 7^th of each month.”

¶19

He further contended that in view of the above cited judgment, they are gradually releasing the payments.

¶20

Considering the fact that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the orders passed by this Court in similar circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the Managing Director and General Manager of the Transport Corporation are directed to disburse the aforementioned retiral benefits to the petitioner in twelve equal monthly instalments, in the light of the common judgment passed by this Court in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 (K.Rajendran & Others vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, rep. by its Managing Director,

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

Madurai and others), dated 12.06.2015. It is also made clear that the first instalment shall commence from 01.10.2016.

¶23

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

-s/d-

Assistant Registrar

True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar
avr
To
1. The Managing Director
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation (Salem) Ltd.
No.12, Ramakrishna Road
Salem-636 007
2. The Administrator
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation (Salem) Ltd.,
Employees Post Retirement
Welfare Fund Scheme
Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai
Chennai – 600 002.
+1 cc to M/s.A.Selvaraju Advocate sr.38330
W.P.No. 14841 of 2016
aa27/07/2016

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Semban, v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Semban, v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Ramachandran Vs The Govt. Of Tamilnadu

C.Idayaraj, S/o.Chinnadurai Vs The Deputy Registrar of

S.Ragupathi Vs The Managing Director

D.Rajendran Vs The Managing Director

N.Selvi Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

K.Kuppusamy Vs The Deputy Registrar of