Disposed

C.Idayaraj, S/o.Chinnadurai v. The Deputy Registrar of

Madras HC5 Jul 2016WP/18485/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dispelled a writ petition seeking to restrain disciplinary proceedings pending criminal case dismissal. The Court observed the criminal offense was meagre despite the petitioner's plea. It directed the respondents to complete the enquiry within three months with the petitioner's cooperation and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to complete enquiry within three months; petitioner to cooperate.

C.Idayaraj, S/o.Chinnadurai Vs The Deputy Registrar of — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 05.07.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

WP.No.18485 of 2016 WMP.No.16189 of 2016

¶6

C.Idayaraj Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies Sankaranpalayam, Vellore

¶9

2.The Joint Registrar/Managing Director Vellore District, Central Cooperative Bank Limited Anna Salai, Chennai-1

¶10

3.The Inspector of Police (L&O) South Police Station, Vellore Respondents

¶11

Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the 1st Respondent from proceeding further pursuant to the charge memo in Na.Ka.No.562/2016/Pa.Tho, dated 23.3.2016 on the file 1st Respondent till the disposal of Cr.No.77 of 2016 on the file of the 3rd Respondent.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sairaman for Mr.V.Elachezhiyan

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, SGP(Co-op)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Writ Petition is filed to forbear the 1st Respondent from proceeding further pursuant to the charge memo dated 23.3.2016 on the file 1st Respondent till the disposal of Cr.No.77 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd Respondent.

¶16

This court heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the materials placed on record.

¶17

After some elaborate arguments, the learned counsel for the Petitioner only pleaded that it is a very meagre offence, which according to the Petitioner, it is not done by him. But, in view of the pendency of the criminal proceedings, since the witnesses are one and the same, prejudice will be

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

caused to him and therefore, the learned counsel seeks at least for deferring it for some time.

¶20

The learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondents 1 and 2 would contend that if the Petitioner cooperates with the enquiry, the disciplinary proceedings will be completed expeditiously.

¶21

Considering the fact that it is only a minor offence, the Respondents are directed to complete the enquiry proceedings, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the Petitioner is also directed to cooperate with the enquiry.

¶22

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is
disposed of. No costs.
Srcm
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(J)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To:
1.The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies,
Sankaranpalayam, Vellore
2.The Joint Registrar/Managing Director, Vellore District,
Central Cooperative Bank Limited, Anna Salai, Chennai-1
3.The Inspector of Police (L&O), South Police Station, Vellore

¶23

- 1 cc to Mr.V.Elanchezhiyan, Advocate SR 37786 + 1 cc to Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, Advocate SR 38106

¶24

1 cc to Govt.Pleader SR 38016

¶25

kgk(co) prk2/8 WP.No.18485 of 2016

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Idayaraj, S/o.Chinnadurai v. The Deputy Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Idayaraj, S/o.Chinnadurai v. The Deputy Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.K.Kali Vs Principal Secretary/

S.Amudhavalli Vs the Secretary to Government

P.Kathirvelan, Vs The Registrar

R.Neelamani Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

B.Ramachandran Vs The Govt. Of Tamilnadu

S.Ragupathi Vs The Managing Director