Dismissed

B.Ramachandran v. The Govt. Of Tamilnadu

Madras HC5 Jul 2016WP/17214/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their Writ Petitions challenging an order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court granted permission, dismissed the petitions as withdrawn, and closed connected miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw writ petitions; writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

B.Ramachandran Vs The Govt. Of Tamilnadu — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.07.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

W.P.Nos. 17214 and 17215 of 2016

¶6

and W.M.P.Nos. 14684, 14685 of 2016 & W.M.P.Nos.14686 & 14687 of 2016 respectively

¶7

B.Ramachandran ... Petitioner in W.P.No.17214 of 2016 Manju Kuppuswamy ... Petitioner in W.P.No.17215 of 2016 Vs. 1.The Government of Tamilnadu rep. by Secretary to Government School Education Department Fort St.George Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director of School Education College Road Chennai-600 006. 3.The Chief Education Officer Vellore District Vellore. 4.Head Master Govt. Higher Secondary School Sundarampalli Tirupattur Vellore District. .. Respondents in both WPs.

¶8

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 1^st respondent in relation to the proceedings issued in Lr.No. [Ms.] No.129 School Education [PK5(2)] 2013-1, dated 17.07.2013, quash the same and pass such further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of this case.

¶9

For Petitioners :Mr.L.P.Maurya in both WPs. For Respondents :Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan in both WPs. Special Government Pleader

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

COMMON ORDER

¶12

Today, when these matters are taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioners had sought the permission of this Court to withdraw these Writ Petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶13

In view of the above submission and endorsement made, permission is granted to withdraw these Writ Petitions and accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶14

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamilnadu, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Chief Education Officer, Vellore District, Vellore. 4.The Head Master, Government High Secondary School, Sundarampalli, Tirupattur, Vellore District.

¶15

bvr[co] srg 23/07/2016

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Ramachandran v. The Govt. Of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Ramachandran v. The Govt. Of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.K.Kali Vs Principal Secretary/

S.Amudhavalli Vs the Secretary to Government

P.Kathirvelan, Vs The Registrar

R.Neelamani Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

C.Idayaraj, S/o.Chinnadurai Vs The Deputy Registrar of

S.Ragupathi Vs The Managing Director