K.Velu, v. The Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a Writ Petition filed by a petitioner challenging a potential disconnection of an electricity supply and a request to forebear a new connection for a respondent, as the petition was voluntarily withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:04.03.2016
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. SIVAGNANAM
W.P. No.14512 of 2015 & M.P.Nos. 1 & 2 of 2015
K.Velu [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
1 The Chairman
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
No.800 Anna Salai, Chennai-2.
2 The Assistant Engineer
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Tharamani-Vijayanagaram
Velachery, Chennai.
3 The Junior Engineer
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Velachery Sub Division
Guindy Division, Chennai.
4 The Inspector of Police
(Law and Order)
Tharamani Police Station,
Chennai-600 113.
5 Rajeswari [ RESPONDENTS ]
Prayer :-Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the
respondents 1 to 3 from disconnecting the existing Service
Connection No.275-015-1551 in respect of the property situate in
Plot Nos.741 and 742 No.9 Pillaiyar Koil Street, Thanthai
Periyar Nagar, Tharamani, Chennai-600 113, which stands
in the name of petitioner and thereby not to provide any new
service connection in the name of the 5th respondent in respect
of the above addressed property.
For petitioner .. Mr.S.Sundara Pandiyan For Respondents .. Mr.S.K.Raameshuwar - R1 to R3
Mr.M.L.Mahendran, -R4 Addl. Government Pleader Mr.G.Poonkunram - R5
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Velu
- respondent
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
Rajeswari
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court