Mr. a.Selvamani, v. The Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking forbearance regarding transformer installation. Having found the third respondent appeared and the transformer was energized, the court held the prayer infructuous and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition were closed as the prayer became infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.3.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.14169 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
Mr. A.Selvamani .. Petitioner
Vs
- 1 The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Anna Salai Chennai-2.
- 2 The Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Paper Mills Road Perambur Chennai-11.
- 3 The Divisional Engineer (TNEB-2)
- Paper Mills Road Perambur Chennai-11.
- 4 The Assistant Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Sidco Nagar Villivakkam Chennai-49.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for forbearance to install a transformer remains maintainable after the transformer was energized.
Whether the petitioner's prayer has become infructuous due to the divisional engineer's appearance and the subsequent energization of the transformer.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. A.Selvamani
- respondent
The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
The Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
The Divisional Engineer (TNEB-2)
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court