R.Kuppan v. G.Gopu
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed a contempt petition filed against failure to comply with an order in W.P.No.29920 of 2012. It was accepted by the Government Advocate that the prior direction issued on 06.01.2015 was complied with.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed and disposed of on the grounds that the previous order of this Court was complied with by the respondent.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :03.03.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contp. No.326 of 2016
R.Kuppan Petitioner
Vs
G.Gopu
The Thasildhar
Taluk Office at Polur
Polur taluk,
Tiruvannamalai District Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for willful
disobedience of the order dated 06.01.2015 in
W.P.Nos.29920 of 2012.
For Petitioner :Mr.A.Gouthaman
For Respondent :Mr.N.Roofus Abraham Government Advocate
O R D E R
This contempt petition has been filed against the non-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed as the impugned order dated 06.01.2015 has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Kuppan
- respondent
G. Gopu
Coram
T.S. Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court