The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition and made an endorsement of withdrawal; accordingly, the court dismissed the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.09.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.13113 of 2016
Ravichandran
.. Petitioner
Vs
The Regional Passport Officer, IV-Floor, Old.No: 758, New No:158, Chennai Royal Towers, Anna Salai, Chennai .. Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus by quashing the order passed on 18.02.2015 in the passport application enquiry form and consequently directing the respondent to issue a passport in the name of Petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vijayakumar
For Respondent : Mr.A.Murughan, Central Government Standing Counsel
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vga
To
The Regional Passport Officer, IV-Floor, Old.No: 758, New No:158, Chennai Royal Towers, Anna Salai, Chennai.
W.P.No.13113 of 2016
rsv(co) cs/16/10/2018
Ravichandran
The Regional Passport Officer
R. MAHADEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
