This writ petition seeking a declaration that a Deed of Cancellation of Settlement Deed was null and void was dismissed as withdrawn by the single judge after the petitioner sought permission to withdraw.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petition also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:09.08.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
W.P.No.32683/2015 & MP.No.1/2015
Mrs.K.Saroja ..Petitioner
Vs. 1.The Sub Registrar O/o.The Sub Registrar, Vandavasi, Thiruvannamalai District. 2.Mr.C.Subramani ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of declaration to declare that the Deed of Cancellation of Settlement Deed executed by the 2nd respondent herein dated 16.12.2014 registered as Document No.5207 of 2014 on the file of the 1st respondent herein by cancelling the Settlement Deed dated 03.02.2010 registered as Document No.379/2010 executed by the 2nd respondent in favour of the petitioner herein is null and void and not binding on the petitioner's possession over the properties namely [1]63 cents comprised in S.No.376/3A; [2]63 cents comprised in S.No.377/1, [3]3 cents comprised in S.No.377/2; [4] 62 cents comprised in S.No.378/2B1, [5]5 cents comprised in S.No.378/2B2; [6]62 cents comprised in S.No.386/2; [7]4 cents comprised in S.No.376/2, together with a well comprised in S.No.376/2 with 3 HP Electric motor and pumpset and EB connection 11 and [8]61 cents comprised in S.No.413/4D; [9] 4 ½ cents comprised in S.No.413/4B ; [10]5 cents comprised in S.No.413/5 ; [11]22 ½ cents comprised in S.No.122/2 ; [12]Punjai land of an extnt of 50 cents comprised in S.No.223, [13]Punjai land of an extent of 2.25 acres comprised in S.No.224/1 ; [14]punjai land of an extent of 1.51 acres comprised in S.No.227/1 ; [15]Punjai land of an extent of 17 cents comprised in S.No.119/13, 7412 sq.ft [688.85 sq.m.] together with a building constructed thereon situated at Manganallur Village, Vandavasi Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, Cheyyar Registration District and Sub Registration District of Vandavasi.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram For R1 : Mr.R.Govindasamy, Spl.GP
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and
has also submitted a letter dated 02.08.2016 to the Registry to that effect. He has also made an endorsement in the writ petition.
2 In view of the submission of the letter dated
02.08.2016 to the Registry as well as the endorsement made by
the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ
petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently,
the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
AP Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
The Sub Registrar
O/o.The Sub Registrar,
Vandavasi,
Thiruvannamalai District.
+ 1 cc to Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram, Advocate Sr 45205
KR/11/8/16
W.P.No.32683/2015
Mrs. K. Saroja
The Sub Registrar O/o. The Sub Registrar, Vandavasi
Mr. C. Subramani
M. Sathyanarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
