Disposed

P. Lakshmanan v. The Transport Commissioner

Madras HC30 Mar 2016WP/11726/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Transport Officer to receive their applications for Autorickshaw permits filed on 01.02.2016 along with fees and consider the same on merits. The Court directed the respondent to do so within six weeks and disposed of the petitions.

What did the court decide?

Directing the 2nd respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 01.02.2016 in Form-CCPA along with prescribed fees for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and consider them on merits within s

P. Lakshmanan Vs The Transport Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 30.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.11726 to 11735 of 2016

¶6

P.Lakshmanan ... Petitioner in W.P.11726 of 2016
B.Hayath Basha ... Petitioner in W.P.11727 of 2016
L.Kesavakumar ... Petitioner in W.P.11728 of 2016
J.Saravanan ... Petitioner in W.P.11729 of 2016
B.Sundar ... Petitioner in W.P.11730 of 2016
N.Shainsha ... Petitioner in W.P.11731 of 2016
V.Maruthamalai ... Petitioner in W.P.11732 of 2016
R.Dhanalakshmi ... Petitioner in W.P.11733 of 2016
S.Sandhiya ... Petitioner in W.P.11734 of 2016
R.Ravichandran ... Petitioner in W.P.11735 of 2016
Vs.
1. The Transport Commissioner,
State Transport Authority,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
... 1 st Respondent in all W.Ps.
2. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-West, Chennai.
... 2 nd Respondent in W.P.11726/2016
2. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-South, Chennai.
... 2 nd Respondent in W.P.11727/2016
2. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-South-East, Chennai.
... 2 nd Respondent in W.P.11728/2016
2. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-North, Chennai.
... 2 nd Respondent in W.Ps.11729 to
11731,11734,11735/2016
2. The Regional Transport Officer,
Thiruvallur.

¶7

... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.11732/2016

¶8

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-Central, Chennai.

¶9

... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.11733/2016

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 01.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindraman (in all W.Ps)

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, (in all W.Ps) Additional Government Pleader

¶14

The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue writ of mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 01.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶15

2.Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents submitted that the 2^nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law.

¶16

3.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 01.02.2016 in Form-CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

4.With this observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶18

Assistant Registrar(CS VI)

¶19

//True Copy//

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

¶22

¶23

The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority,

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶25

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-West, Chennai.

¶26

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-South, Chennai.

¶27

The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-South-East, Chennai.
5. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-North, Chennai.
6. The Regional Transport Officer,
Thiruvallur.
7. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-Central, Chennai.
+10cc's to Mr.S.Govindraman, Advocate, S.R.No.20009
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.20087
W.P.Nos.11726 to 11735 of 2016
JSV(CO)
CA(01/04/2016)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P. Lakshmanan v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Lakshmanan v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Muthukumar Vs The Regional Transport Officer

N.Venkatesan, Vs The Transport Commissioner

M.Radhakrishnan, Vs The Transport Commissioner

M/S S.G.Jayaraj Nadar & Sons Vs the Deputy Commercial Tax

M/S.Susee Trades P.Ltd. Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

L.Kesavakumar Vs The Transport Commissioner