Disposed

M.Radhakrishnan, v. The Transport Commissioner

Madras HC29 Mar 2016WP/11468/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition seeks a direction under Article 226 for the Regional Transport Officer to receive and consider applications dated 03.02.2016 for Autorickshaw permits in Form CCPA. The court, without expressing an opinion on merits, directed the respondent to receive the applications and consider them on merits within six weeks before disposing of the petitions.

What did the court decide?

The 2nd respondent directed to receive applications dated 03.02.2016 in Form CCPA with prescribed fee and consider them on merits within six weeks.

M.Radhakrishnan, Vs The Transport Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:29.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.11468 to 11477 of 2016

¶6

M.Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner in W.P.11468 of 2016 L.Inbaraj ... Petitioner in W.P.11469 of 2016 P.Padma ... Petitioner in W.P.11470 of 2016 P.Abdur Rahman ... Petitioner in W.P.11471 of 2016 P.Rasu ... Petitioner in W.P.11472 of 2016 D.Uma Rani ... Petitioner in W.P.11473 of 2016 G.Pavithra ... Petitioner in W.P.11474 of 2016 D.Prabakaran ... Petitioner in W.P.11475 of 2016 V.Purushothaman ... Petitioner in W.P.11476 of 2016 G.Palani ... Petitioner in W.P.11477 of 2016 Vs. 1.The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. ... 1^st Respondent in all W.Ps. 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.Ps.11468 to 11473, 11477/2016 3.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South-East, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.11474/2016 4.The Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.11475/2016 5.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North West, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.11476/2016

¶7

Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 03.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindraman (in all W.Ps) For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, (in all W.Ps) Additional Government Pleader

¶10

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶11

The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue writ of mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 03.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶12

2.Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents submitted that the 2^nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law.

¶13

3.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 03.02.2016 in Form-CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

4.With this observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs. va Sd/Asst.Registrar

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

1.The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶19

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North, Chennai.

¶20

3.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South-East, Chennai.

¶21

4.The Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee, Chennai.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

5.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North West, Chennai.

¶24

- 10 ccs to Mr.S.Govindraman, Advocate Sr 19270

¶25

- 1 cc to The Govt.Pleader, Sr 19715

¶26

KR/13/4/16

¶27

W.P.Nos.11468 to 11477 of 2016

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Radhakrishnan, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Radhakrishnan, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Umapathy Vs Manickam

N.Vijayalakshmi, Vs Regional Transport Officer

Thirupathy Kumar Khemka, Vs The Tax Recovery Officer-2

Ags Entertainment Private Vs The Assistant Commissioner of

Sujatha Paints, Vs National Small Industries

S.Muthukumar Vs The Regional Transport Officer