Dismissed

N.Venkatesan, v. The Transport Commissioner

Madras HC29 Mar 2016WP/11452/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed the Regional Transport Officer to receive and consider applications for Autorickshaw permits filed on 25.01.2016 in Form CCPA with prescribed fees within six weeks, without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 2nd respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 25.01.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee and consider the same on merits within six weeks.

N.Venkatesan, Vs The Transport Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 29.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.11452 to 11467 of 2016

¶6

N.Venkatesan ... Petitioner in W.P.11452 of 2016 S.Ravichandran ... Petitioner in W.P.11453 of 2016 V.Iyyanar ... Petitioner in W.P.11454 of 2016 P.Thangamariappan ... Petitioner in W.P.11455 of 2016 A.Sankar ... Petitioner in W.P.11456 of 2016 N.Baskaran ... Petitioner in W.P.11457 of 2016 T.Bhuvaneshwari ... Petitioner in W.P.11458 of 2016 E.Sathiyamurthy ... Petitioner in W.P.11459 of 2016 J.Swaminathan ... Petitioner in W.P.11460 of 2016 M.Lakshmi ... Petitioner in W.P.11461 of 2016 M.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.11462 of 2016 K.Mohan ... Petitioner in W.P.11463 of 2016 J.Prakash ... Petitioner in W.P.11464 of 2016 M.Rajeswari ... Petitioner in W.P.11465 of 2016 R.Sampath ... Petitioner in W.P.11466 of 2016 S.Gnanasundaram ... Petitioner in W.P.11467 of 2016 Vs. 1.The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. ... 1^st Respondent in all W.Ps. 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.Ps.11452 to 11454/2016 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.Ps.11455 to 11458/2016 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai East, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.Ps.11459 to 11461/2016 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North East, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.11462/2016

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South West, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.11463/2016 2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North West, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.11464/2016

¶9

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai Sholinganallur, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.11465/2016

¶10

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Meenambakkam, Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.Ps.11466 & 11467/2016

¶11

Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 25.01.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindraman (in all W.Ps) For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, (in all W.Ps) Additional Government Pleader C O M M O N O R D E R

¶13

The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue writ of mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 25.01.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶14

2.Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents submitted that the 2^nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law.

¶15

3.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 25.01.2016 in Form-CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

4.With this observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶18

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶19

//True Copy//

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

¶22

1.The Transport Commissioner,
State Transport Authority,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai North, Chennai.
3.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai South, Chennai.
4.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai East, Chennai.
5.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai North East, Chennai.
6.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai South West, Chennai.
7.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai North West, Chennai.
8.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai Sholinganallur, Chennai.
9.The Regional Transport Officer,
Meenambakkam, Chennai.
+16 CCs to Mr.S.Govindraman, Advocate Sr.19269
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.19714

¶23

W.P.Nos.11452 to 11467 of 2016

¶24

vsn[co]

¶25

srg 06/04/2016

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Venkatesan, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Venkatesan, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Umapathy Vs Manickam

N.Vijayalakshmi, Vs Regional Transport Officer

Thirupathy Kumar Khemka, Vs The Tax Recovery Officer-2

Ags Entertainment Private Vs The Assistant Commissioner of

Sujatha Paints, Vs National Small Industries

S.Muthukumar Vs The Regional Transport Officer