Allowed

P. Saranya, v. J. Saravanan

Madras HC1 Aug 2016TR CMP/406/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted transfer of a divorce petition from the Additional Family Court, Chennai to the Sub Court, Rasipuram, to be tried along with an existing restitution of conjugal rights petition due to the petitioner's travel difficulties.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of O.P.No. 2122 of 2015 from III Additional Family Court, Chennai to the Sub Court, Rasipuram to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No. 51 of 2015.

P. Saranya, Vs J. Saravanan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.08.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM

¶5

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.406 of 2016

¶6

and

¶7

C.M.P.No.10878 of 2016

¶8

P.Saranya ... Petitioner/Respondent Vs. J.Saravanan ... Respondent/Petitioner

¶9

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, praying to withdraw and to transfer the case pending on the file of Hon'ble III Additional Family Court, Chennai in O.P.No. 2122 of 2015 to the file of the Hon'ble Sub Court, Rasidpuram to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No. 51 of 2015.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Arul Murugan For Respondent : No appearance O R D E R

¶11

Even though the respondent has been served and the name of the respondent appears in the cause list, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court either in person or through a pleader. Hence, the matter is decided on merits.

¶12

Petitioner has filed the present petition seeking transfer of case pending on the file of Hon'ble III Additional Family Court, Chennai in O.P.No. 2122 of 2015 to the file of the Hon'ble Sub Court, Rasidpuram to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No. 51 of 2015.

¶13

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the respondent/husband has filed O.P.No. 2122 of 2015 on the file of III Additional Family Court, Chennai, seeking divorce and the petitioner/wife has filed H.M.O.P.No.51 of 2015 on the file of

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Sub Court, Rasipuram, for restitution of conjugal rights. The petitioner seeks transfer on the ground that she finds it difficult to travel from Ariya Goundampatti, Rasipuram Taluk in Namakkal District to Chennai for each and every hearing and hence, it would be desirable to have both cases tried together.

¶16

Considering the submissions made, this Court directs transfer of O.P.No. 2122 of 2015 on the file of III Additional Family Court, Chennai, to the file of Sub Court, Rasipuram, to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.51 of 2015.

¶17

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(J)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsg
To
1. III Additional Family Court, Chennai.
2. Sub Court, Rasipuram.
+1cc to M/S.G.Arul Murugan, Advocate Sr.43379

¶19

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.406 of 2016

¶20

ala[co] srg 23/08/2016

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P. Saranya, v. J. Saravanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Saranya, v. J. Saravanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Azgar Ali Vs K.S. Bhadurul Jaman

G.Suganthi Vs Sulochana

G.Muthukumar Vs R.Bhuvaneshwari

T.Ramya Vs J.Thyagarajan

S.Sundaravalli Vs M.Ganesan

Rajeswari,W/O.Palani Vs G.Subramanian