Allowed

T.Ramya v. J.Thyagarajan

Madras HC1 Aug 2016TR CMP/396/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Transfer Petition filed under Section 24 CPC, the petitioner requested transfer of an HMOP pending at Sub Court Kancheepuram to Family Court Chennai, citing travel difficulty caring for parents and child. The Court granted the transfer without ordering respondent's appearance.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P. No. 82 of 2016 from Sub Court, Kancheepuram to Family Court, Chennai.

T.Ramya Vs J.Thyagarajan — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.08.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM

¶5

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.396 of 2016

¶6

and

¶7

C.M.P.No.10500 of 2016

¶8

Mrs.T.Ramya ... Petitioner/Respondent

¶9

¶10

Mr.J.Thiyagarajan ... Respondent/Petitioner

¶11

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, praying to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No. 82 of 2016 filed by the respondent herein pending on the file of Sub Court, Kancheepuram and transfer the same to the Family Court, Chennai.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Selvaraju For Respondent : No appearance O R D E R

¶13

Even though the respondent has been served and the name of the respondent appears in the cause list, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court either in person or through a pleader. Hence, the matter is decided on merits.

¶14

Petitioner has filed the present petition seeking transfer of H.M.O.P.No. 82 of 2016 pending on the file of Sub Court, Kancheepuram to the file of Family Court, Chennai.

¶15

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the respondent/husband has filed H.M.O.P.No. 82 of 2016 on the file of Sub Court, Kancheepuram. As the petitioner has to take care of his aged parents and her child, she finds it difficult to travel from Chennai to Kancheepuram to attend the case in H.M.O.P.No. 82 of 2016 filed by the respondent/husband. Hence, the petitioner prays for transfer of H.M.O.P.No. 82 of 2016 pending on the file of learned Sub Court, Kancheepuram to the file of Family Court, Chennai.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioner, this Court directs transfer of H.M.O.P.No. 82 of 2016 pending on the file of learned Sub Court, Kancheepuram to the file of Family Court, Chennai.

¶18

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition, accordingly, is ordered. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsg
To
1. The Principal Family Judge, Chennai.
2. The Sub Judge, Kancheepuram.
1 cc to Mr.D.Selvarasu, Advocate, sr.43502
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.396 of 2016
nrjk co
kra 17.08.2016

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Ramya v. J.Thyagarajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Ramya v. J.Thyagarajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Azgar Ali Vs K.S. Bhadurul Jaman

G.Suganthi Vs Sulochana

G.Muthukumar Vs R.Bhuvaneshwari

P. Saranya, Vs J. Saravanan

S.Sundaravalli Vs M.Ganesan

Rajeswari,W/O.Palani Vs G.Subramanian