Jayaraj v. a.Sampath Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition for want of prosecution on the part of the petitioner who failed to appear on two listing dates.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.06.2016
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM
Crl.R.C.No.673 of 2016
Jayaraj ...Petitioner/Accused Vs. A.Sampath Kumar rep by power Agent R.Selvam. ...Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order made in Crl.MP.No.7099 of 2015 in CC.No.317 of 2013 dated 29.01.2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Salem. For Petitioner : No appearance. For respondent : Notice Served. O R D E R There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 17.06.2016, hence the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the learned counsel on record. Therefore, the criminal revision is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tsh
To
- The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Salem.
- Do-Thro The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Salem.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jayaraj
- respondent
A. Sampath Kumar
Coram
G. Chockalingam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court