Allowed

Ranjitham v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC23 Jun 2016CRL OP/13025/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners accused of assault and criminal intimidation before the JD police station. The court exercised its discretion based on the victim's discharge and lack of prior cases, imposing reporting and bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioners ordered to execute bond with sureties and report to police daily.

Ranjitham Vs the State Rep by Its — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.13025 of 2016

¶3

G.CHOCKALINGAM, J.

¶4

The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294[b], 323, 324 and 506[i] of IPC in Crime No.134 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶5

2. The case of the prosecution is that on account of previous enmity, these petitioners assaulted the de facto complainant with hands, due to which, the victim sustained injuries and was hospitalized.

¶6

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

¶7

4. The learned Government Advocate [Criminal Side] appearing for the respondent submitted that the victim has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against these petitioners.

¶8

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the victim has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against these petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶9

¶10

G.CHOCKALINGAM, J.

¶11

sri

¶12

6 .Accordingly, it is ordered that the petitioners shall be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the following conditions:-

¶13

(i) Each petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi; and on further condition that

¶14

(ii) The petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶15

(iii) If the petitioners fail to comply with any one of the above conditions imposed by this Court, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically dismissed without any further reference to this Court.

¶16

23.06.2016

¶17

sri

¶18

Crl.O.P.No.13025 of 2016

Ranjitham v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjitham v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Selvaraj Vs the State Rep. by

Krishnamoorthy Vs Lavanya

Velmurugan Vs State Rep by

D.Ashok Kumar Vs K.Ganesh

Viji @ Vijayalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Sathish Vs State Rep.by