The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC after the petitioner withdrew the matter via a recorded endorsement stating the dispute was settled out of court.
The Criminal Revision was dismissed as withdrawn; the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.06.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM
Crl.R.C.371 of 2009 and MP.No.1 of 2009
Mohammed Ali
...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused
Vs.
M/s.Sam tech Systems
Rep by its Proprietor, Sambath Kumar Old No.105, New No.154,
Swamy Naicken Street,
Bee Kay Buildings III Floor
Chindaripet, Chennai-2. ...Respondent/Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment made in Crl.A.No.207 of 2006 dated 07.01.2009 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai confirming the order passed in CC.No.13509 of 2003 dated 26.06.2006 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mrs.V.S.Ghousi Banu for Mr.A.Abdul Rahim
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision and he has also made an endorsement to that effect and the same reads as follows:-
“The matter is settled out of Court, this revision may be withdrawn.”
2.The above said endorsement is recorded.
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
ala(co) prk14/7
Crl.R.C.371 of 2009
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammed Ali
M/s. Sam tech Systems
G. Chockalingam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
