Allowed

Senthilraja v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Apr 2016CRL OP(MD)/6045/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted bail to the petitioner, an accused in a 302 IPC and 498A case, after 89 days in judicial custody, directing his daily appearance to police and execution of a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum, appearing daily at police station until further orders.

Senthilraja Vs the Inspector of Police — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Twelfth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.6045 of 2016

¶6

SENTHILRAJA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1

¶7

Vs THE STATE REP.BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE COURTALLAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶9

CR. NO.11/2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S M.SOLAISAMY Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJA RAJAN,Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶12

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner is arrayed as A1 and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.02.2016 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 174 Cr.P.C. altered into Sections 498(A) and 302 IPC, in Crime No.11 of 2016 on the file of the respondent Police and hence, seeks bail.

¶15

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is in custody for more than 89 days and a false case has been foisted against him.

¶16

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) would submit that the investigation is pending.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 15.02.2016, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Shankottai, and on further condition that

¶18

the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. sd/12/04/2016 / TRUE COPY /

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SHENKOTTAI. 2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE COURTALLAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶21

+1. CC to M/S M.SOLAISAMY Advocate SR.No.20658.

¶22

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6045 of 2016 Date :12/04/2016

¶23

AM/NGM.SS/AR-I/13.04.2016/2P/7C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Senthilraja v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senthilraja v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Latha Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Ajay @ Syed Seeni Erwadi Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Sivasanthi Vs the Inspector of Police

Kannan Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajasekaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Seenivasan Vs the Inspector of Police