Allowed

Sivasanthi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Apr 2016CRL OP(MD)/6129/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted bail to two accused persons facing charges of harassment and assault under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act and the IPC, subject to specific conditions regarding police appearance and bond amount.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail executing a bond for Rs.10,000 with two sureties each and appearing at the police station daily.

Sivasanthi Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Eleventh day of April Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.6129 & 6130 of 2016

¶6

SIVASANTHI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6129 of 2016 CHINNASAMY ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6130 of 2016

¶7

THE STATE REP.BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE D3, KOODALPUTHUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

¶9

CRIME NO. 412/2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN BOTH THE PETITIONS

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S F.DEEPAK Advocate IN BOTH THE PETITIONS

¶11

For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) IN BOTH THE PETITIONS

¶12

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A3 and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.03.2016 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 452, 294(b), 323, 427 and 506(i) of I.P.C., r/w Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.412 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail.

¶15

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are in custody from 27.03.2016 and a false case has been foisted against them for an offence punishable under Section 452, 294(b), 323, 427 and 506(i) of I.P.C., r/w Sections 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act.

¶16

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) would submit that the investigation is pending.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioners are in judicial custody

¶18

from 27.03.2016, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Additional Mahila Court, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks from today without fail and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

¶19

sd/-

¶20

11/04/2016

¶21

/ TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶23

Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT ,MADURAI.

¶25

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D3, KOODALPUTHUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

¶26

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶27

4 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, CENTRAL JAIL, MADURAI.

¶28

+2. CC to M/S F.DEEPAK Advocate SR.NoS19893&19894. GJM/SK/SKN/AR-I-11.4.16-2P-7C

¶29

ORDER

¶30

¶31

CRL OP(MD) No.6129 & 6130 of 2016

¶32

Date :11/04/2016

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sivasanthi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sivasanthi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Periyakaruppan (Died) Vs Marimuthu (Died)

N. Renukadevi Vs E.Lalitha and Another

Will of R.Gopal Vs G.Pandurangan

Latha Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Ajay @ Syed Seeni Erwadi Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Thayammal Vs the Inspector of Police