Allowed

R. Ajay @ Syed Seeni Erwadi v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Apr 2016CRL OP(MD)/6109/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The petitioner, accused of offences under Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(i) IPC, was granted bail with conditions including surrendering to police for daily interrogation and executing a bond before the District Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, appearing before the Magistrate within 15 days, and submitting to daily police interrogation for two weeks.

R. Ajay @ Syed Seeni Erwadi Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Eleventh day of April Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶5

R. AJAY @ SYED SEENI ERWADI@ KADAR MOHAMMED ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1

¶6

STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THONDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT,

¶7

CR NO. 157 OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶8

For Petitioner : M/S K.RAMANATHAN Advocate

¶9

For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶12

The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.157 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶13

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence and a false case has been foisted against him.

¶14

3.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

¶15

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶16

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai and Ramanathapuram District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the

¶17

respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks, without fail and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶18

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate

¶19

within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶20

7.It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to comply with the condition as stipulated above by this Court, the respondent police is directed to move an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail before this Court immediately.

sd/-

11/04/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶25

Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM

¶28

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,RAMANATHAPURAM

¶29

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶30

THONDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶31

4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

+1. CC to M/S K.RAMANATHAN Advocate SR.No.19918

¶33

ORDER

¶34

¶35

CRL OP(MD) No.6109 of 2016 Date :11/04/2016 AA/AN-MP/AR-I/12.04.2016/2p-6c

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R. Ajay @ Syed Seeni Erwadi v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Ajay @ Syed Seeni Erwadi v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Periyakaruppan (Died) Vs Marimuthu (Died)

N. Renukadevi Vs E.Lalitha and Another

Will of R.Gopal Vs G.Pandurangan

Latha Vs the Inspector of Police

Sivasanthi Vs the Inspector of Police

Thayammal Vs the Inspector of Police