Allowed

Subbiya v. State by Forest Ranger

Madras HC4 Apr 2016CRL OP/6516/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Crl.OP No.6516 of 2016, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, allowing release on bail if arrested and imposing conditions for daily police reporting and magistrate appearance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail, to appear before police for two weeks and magistrate within 15 days, on bond with two sureties each.

Subbiya Vs State by Forest Ranger — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

Crl.OP No.6516 of 2016

¶3

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

¶4

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A3 & A5, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for alleged offences punishable under Sections Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, chapter 1 part 2(1), 14, 3(9), 5, 39(1) (2) chapter 6, 50, 51, 1 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, in W/L. OR. 2 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶5

2.The case of the prosecution is that when the respondent police checked the car, the accused was found in possession of one big lizard (Udumbu).

¶6

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence.

¶7

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioners have no previous case and A1 and A2 were arrested and released on bail.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and further considering the fact that A1 and A2 were arrested and released on bail, this court is constrained to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶9

¶10

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

¶11

sms

¶12

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pandalur and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶13

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶14

sms

¶15

04.04.2016

¶16

Crl.OP No.6516 of 2016

Subbiya v. State by Forest Ranger

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subbiya v. State by Forest Ranger

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Prakash, Vs State Rep. by Inspector of

P.J.Manigandan Vs the State Rep. by

Natarajan Vs State Rep by

T.Chitra Selvi Vs the Inspector of Police

Santhanam, S/O. Munusamy, Vs State Rep. by the Inspector

R. Veeramani, Vs State Rep. by the Inspector