Allowed

Santhanam, S/O. Munusamy, v. State Rep. by the Inspector

Madras HC4 Apr 2016CRL OP/5184/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of offences under Sections 341, 324, and 506 of the IPC, imposing strict conditions including daily police appearances for two weeks and surrender within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be released on bail with conditions including execution of bond, daily police appearances for two weeks, and appearance before Magistrate within 15 days.

Santhanam, S/O. Munusamy, Vs State Rep. by the Inspector — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.5184 of 2016

¶3

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

¶4

The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 324 & 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.161 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶5

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries.

¶6

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

¶7

4. Learned Government Advocate [Criminal side] appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against these petitioners.

¶8

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against these petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶9

¶10

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

¶11

sms

¶12

6 .Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ponneri and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶13

7 .The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶14

04 .04.2016

¶15

sms

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.5184 of 2016

Santhanam, S/O. Munusamy, v. State Rep. by the Inspector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santhanam, S/O. Munusamy, v. State Rep. by the Inspector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Prakash, Vs State Rep. by Inspector of

P.J.Manigandan Vs the State Rep. by

Natarajan Vs State Rep by

T.Chitra Selvi Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Veeramani, Vs State Rep. by the Inspector

Subbiya Vs State by Forest Ranger