The order records the submission of the Government Advocate that a prior criminal enquiry was closed. Consequently, the Supreme Court sealed and disposed of the criminal original petition for anticipatory bail; no substantive decision on bail was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Crl.O.P.No. 5 4 6 7 of 2 0 1 6
K. KALYANA S U NDARAM, J .
The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail.
vsg
K. Kalyana Sundaram
State
K. Kalyana Sundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
