Disposed

Manimegalai v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC20 Jun 2016CRL OP/12891/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court directed the Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal, to consider and dispose of the petitioner's bail application on the same day, acknowledging the specific bar on anticipatory bail under Section 18 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal, to consider the bail application in Crime No.151 of 2016 on the same day and dispose of it on merits.

Manimegalai Vs the State Rep by Its — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 20.06.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.OP.No.12891 of 2016

Manimegalai

... Petitioner

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Senthamangalam Police Station,

¶10

Namakkal District.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal and to consider the bail application on the same day in connection with Crime No.151 of 2016 on the file of the respondent.

¶13

For Petitioner :Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi

¶14

For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal and to consider the bail application on the same day in connection with Crime No.151 of 2016 on the file of the respondent.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 355 & 392 IPC r/w 3(i) (r) (s) of the SC/ST Act (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Ordinance 2015 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the said Act, the petitioner cannot move any anticipatory bail application and therefore, the petitioner has come forward with the said prayer.

¶18

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondent.

¶19

4.Considering the submissions of both sides and also considering the nature of the prayer in this case in view of the

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

specific bar under Section 18 of the S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act that the petitioner cannot move any anticipatory bail, the Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal, is directed to consider the bail application, in the event of the petitioner filing such petition in Crime No.151 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law on the same day.

¶22

With this observation, this criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶23

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
Senthamangalam Police Station,
Namakkal District.
2.The Principal Sessions Judge,
Namakkal.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to M/S.W.Camyles Gandhi, Advocate sr.33882
Crl.OP.No.12891 of 2016
vsn[co]
srg 21/06/2016

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Manimegalai v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manimegalai v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh @ Sureshbabu, Vs State Rep. by the Deputy

Mohamed Bilal Vs the State Rep by Its

K.Karthikeyan, Advocate, Vs P.Vasuki, W/O.Karthikeyan

S.P. Arumugam, Vs State Rep. by Its the

Dr. Kalavani, Vs State Rep. by the

Mrs.J.Jayabackiyam @ Vs the Commissioner of Police