Disposed

Dr. Kalavani, v. State Rep. by the

Madras HC20 Jun 2016CRL OP/9937/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras, in Criminal Original Petition No.9937 of 2016, directed the first respondent police to conduct an enquiry on a complaint lodged by the petitioner. A regular case was ordered to be registered during the enquiry if a cognizable offence is made out, relying on Lalita Kumari.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conduct enquiry and register a case if a cognizable offence is made out.

Dr. Kalavani, Vs State Rep. by the — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:20.06.2016

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.9937 of 2016

¶6

Kalavani ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.State rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
Central Crime Branch (Team-I),
Chennai.
2.State rep by
The Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City.
.. Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482
of Cr.P.C to direct the 1 st respondent to register a case on the
basis of the complaint dated 01.03.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.I.Thirumoorthy
For Respondents : Mr. C.Emalias
Additional Public Prosecutor

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent police to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner.

¶9

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.

¶10

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending before the first respondent.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the first respondent police is directed to conduct enquiry and during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, a regular case shall be registered, following the decision laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttarpradesh and Others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1, otherwise the petition may be closed under intimation to the petitioner.

¶13

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶14

ds
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
1.The Inspector of Police,
Central Crime Branch (Team-I),
Chennai.
2.The Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+ 1 cc to Mr.P.I.Thirumoorthy, Advocate S.R.No.34031

¶15

KR/4/7/16

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.9937 of 2016

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr. Kalavani, v. State Rep. by the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Kalavani, v. State Rep. by the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh @ Sureshbabu, Vs State Rep. by the Deputy

Mohamed Bilal Vs the State Rep by Its

K.Karthikeyan, Advocate, Vs P.Vasuki, W/O.Karthikeyan

S.P. Arumugam, Vs State Rep. by Its the

Mrs.J.Jayabackiyam @ Vs the Commissioner of Police

R.Shanthi Vs the Inspector of Police