Disposed

B.Indra v. State Rep by

Madras HC20 Jun 2016CRL OP/12504/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order directed the Respondent Inspector of Police to conduct a special police report (SP report) inquiry on the petitioners' complaint. The Court held that during the inquiry, if a cognizable offence is made out, a regular case must be registered in accordance with Lalita Kumari; otherwise the petition closes.

What did the court decide?

The Respondent was directed to conduct an inquiry and register a regular case if a cognizable offence is made out during the inquiry.

B.Indra Vs State Rep by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 20.06.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.12504 of 2016

¶6

1.B.Indra
2.R.Geetha
3.B.Vaishnavi
4.K.Lakshmi @ Dhanalakshmi ... Petitioners
Vs
State rep by
Inspector of Police
K-9, Thiru.vi.ka.Nagar Police Station
Chennai. ... Respondent
Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondent to
register the complaint dated 25.04.2016 and investigate the
matter.

¶7

For petitioners Mr.M.Madhan Kumar
For respondent Mr.C.Emalias
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER

¶8

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register the complaint dated 25.04.2016 and investigate the matter.

¶9

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

¶10

It is represented by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that based on the petitioner's complaint dated 25.04.2016, the petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R. No.119/2016, before the respondent.

¶11

Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent is directed to conduct enquiry and during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, a regular case shall be registered, in accordance with the law laid down by the Honourable Apex Court in Lalita Kumari

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

vs. Govt. of U.P. & others [(2014) 4 SCC 1], otherwise, the petition may be closed under intimation to the petitioner.

¶14

This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

¶15

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IV)

¶16

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1 Inspector of Police
K-9, Thiru.vi.ka.Nagar Police Station
Chennai.
2 The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to M.Madhankumar, Advocate Sr.33907
Crl.O.P.No.12504 of 2016
rsy[co]
srg 12/07/2016

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Indra v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Indra v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh @ Sureshbabu, Vs State Rep. by the Deputy

Mohamed Bilal Vs the State Rep by Its

K.Karthikeyan, Advocate, Vs P.Vasuki, W/O.Karthikeyan

S.P. Arumugam, Vs State Rep. by Its the

Dr. Kalavani, Vs State Rep. by the

Mrs.J.Jayabackiyam @ Vs the Commissioner of Police