Allowed

M.a.Rajkumar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 Mar 2016CRL OP/1087/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings C.C.No.523 of 2014. The quashing was done due to the defacto complainant's affidavit stating no objection, leading to the closure of connected miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Quashed the proceedings in C.C.No.523 of 2014 and closed connected miscellaneous petitions.

M.a.Rajkumar Vs the Inspector of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.03.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.1087 of 2016

¶6

and Crl.M.P.Nos.481 and 482 of 2016

¶7

1.M.A.Rajkumar 2.R.Devaki .. Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Inspector of Police W35 All Women police station Tambaram, Chennai-45.

¶10

2.D.Deepa .. Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for entire records leading to the filing of charge sheet in C.C.No.523/2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tambaram and quash the same.

¶12

For Petitioners :Mr.A.Selvendran

¶13

For R1 :Mr.C.Emalias Addl. Public Prosecutor For R2 :Mr.A.Tamilvanan

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.523/2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tambaram.

¶16

2.Today, both the first petitioner, the second respondent and their respective counsel are present and their identification have been verified by this Court. The defacto complainant/second respondent herein has submitted that she has no objection to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.523 of 2014 and she has also filed an affidavit to that effect.

¶17

3.Recording the affidavit filed by the defacto complainant and the submission so made by her, the Criminal

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Original Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.523 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tambaram is hereby quashed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶20

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS IV )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
kj
To
1.The Inspector of Police
W35 All Women police station
Tambaram, Chennai-45.
2.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tambaram.
3.The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Chennai.
1 cc to Mr.A. Selvendran, Advocate, Sr. 17850
Crl.O.P.No.1087 of 2016
and Crl.M.P.Nos.481 and 482 of 2016
KK (CO)
kk 31/3

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.a.Rajkumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.a.Rajkumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Uthaman Vs Murugan

Tmt.a.Anitha Vs C.Ravichandran

Mrs.Gowri Vs P.Preneetha

Lakshmi, Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

S. Manikandan, Vs State by the Inspector of

K. Sathiskumar, Vs S. Megalam