Allowed

K. Sathiskumar, v. S. Megalam

Madras HC18 Mar 2016CRL OP/6125/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, on a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, directed the Judicial Magistrate, Namakkal, to dispose of the pending case D.V.C.No.4/2015 within three months, considering the petitioner's divorce decree and delay.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Namakkal, to dispose of case D.V.C.No.4/2015 within three months.

K. Sathiskumar, Vs S. Megalam — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. MALA

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.6125 of 2016

¶6

K.Sathiskumar
2. Karunanithi
3. K.Malarkodi
4. K.Dineshkumar
5. K.Karthikeyan ... Petitioners/Accused
. Vs .
S.Megala ... Respondent/Complainant

¶7

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Namakkal, to complete the enquiry of the case in D.V.C.No.4/2015 within the time fixed by this Court.

¶8

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Nirmala
ORDER

¶9

The petitioner has come forward with the present petition seeking to issue a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Namakkal, to complete the enquiry of the case in D.V.C.No.4/2015 within the time fixed by this Court.

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the respondent/wife, a case in D.V.C.No.4/2015 is pending. It is further submitted that already, the first petitioner, who is the husband of the respondent, has obtained decree of divorce and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief.

¶11

Notice to the respondent is dispensed with.

¶12

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to issue a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Namakkal, to dispose the case. Accordingly, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Namakkal, is directed

¶13

to dispose of the case in D.V.C.No.4 of 2015, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶15

//True Copy//

¶16

Sub Assistant Registrar
Jrl
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II,
Namakkal.
2.Do- Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Namakkal.
+1cc to Mr.I.C.Vasudevan, Advocate, S.R.No.17811
CRL.O.P.No.6125 of 2016
SKV(CO)
CA(31/03/2016)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K. Sathiskumar, v. S. Megalam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Sathiskumar, v. S. Megalam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Uthaman Vs Murugan

Tmt.a.Anitha Vs C.Ravichandran

Mrs.Gowri Vs P.Preneetha

Lakshmi, Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

S. Manikandan, Vs State by the Inspector of

H.B.N. Field Workers and Vs State Rep by