Allowed

S. Manikandan, v. State by the Inspector of

Madras HC18 Mar 2016CRL OP/6130/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court directed the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem, to accept the petitioners' surrender and consider their bail applications on the very same day purely on the basis of merits and in accordance with law regarding offences under IPC and SC/ST Atrocities Act.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem, Special Judge for Prevention of SC & ST Atrocities Act, to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail applications on the very same d

S. Manikandan, Vs State by the Inspector of — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 18.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. MALA

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.6130 of 2016

¶6

S.Manikandan
2. Prabakaran
3. Ramchandran
4. Manivannan
5. Ayyadurai .. Petitioners/Accused
.. Vs ..
State rep. by,
The Inspector of Police,
Mechheri Police Station,
Salem District.
Crime No.70 of 2016. .. Respondent/Complainant
Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section
482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct
the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem, Special Judge
for Prevention of SC & ST Atrocities Act, to consider the
surrender and bail application of the petitioners on the
same day in Crime No.70 of 2016 on the file of the
respondent police.

¶7

For Petitioners: Mr.B.Mahendra Naidu For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶8

Heard both sides.

¶9

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code r/w Section 3(1) (x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, in Crime No.70 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, move this petition seeking a direction to the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem, Special Judge for Prevention of SC & ST Atrocities Act, to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail applications on the same day on merits, in relating to Crime No.70 of 2016.

¶10

Perused the records.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital.

¶13

The offences complained of, other than the offence under the Special enactment, may not be serious in nature warranting initial detention in jail, even before considering the bail application.

¶14

Therefore, the learned Principal Sessions Judge,
Salem, Special Judge for Prevention of SC & ST Atrocities
Act, is directed to accept the surrender of the
petitioners and consider their bail applications on the
very same day purely on the basis of merits and in
accordance with law. Accordingly, this Criminal Original
Petition is ordered.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
Jrl
To
1. The Principal Sessions Judge,
Special Judge for Prevention of SC & ST Atrocities Act,
Salem.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Mechheri Police Station,
Salem District.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
CRL.O.P.No.6130 of 2016

¶15

SKV (CO) kk 29/3

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Manikandan, v. State by the Inspector of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Manikandan, v. State by the Inspector of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Uthaman Vs Murugan

Tmt.a.Anitha Vs C.Ravichandran

Mrs.Gowri Vs P.Preneetha

Lakshmi, Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

K. Sathiskumar, Vs S. Megalam

H.B.N. Field Workers and Vs State Rep by