Partly allowed

Arumugam v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC26 Jul 2016CRL MP(MD)/5767/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a thin order on modification of bail conditions. The court modified the existing condition imposed on the petitioner to require reporting to the police as and when required, noting that the petitioner was complying with conditions regularly.

What did the court decide?

The bail condition was modified to require the petitioner to report to the police as and when required.

Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth day of July Two Thousand Sixteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.5767 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4348 of 2016

¶6

ARUMUGAM ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶7

Vs STATE REP.BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE OTTANCHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CR. NO.35/2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD). 4348 of 2016 dated 14.3.2016 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S P.MAHENDRAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶11

Heard both sides.

¶12

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly.

¶13

3.Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, the condition imposed already on the petitioner is modified to the effect that the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent Police as and when required.

sd/-

26/07/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

¶20

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OTTANCHATHIRAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 2 -do-thro THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE OTTANCHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶21

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶22

sm:ARK-PV:SAR III:29.07.2016:2P/5C

¶23

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.5767 of 2016 IN

¶24

CRL OP(MD) No.4348 of 2016

¶25

Date :26/07/2016

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arumugam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arumugam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

George Rex Vs the Insepector of Police

V.Dinesh Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Shanmuga Priya Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Natesan Vs the State Rep.by

Rev.Fr.Devadoss Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajkumar Vs the Inspector of Police