This single judge order dismissed a petitioner's prayer to relax previous conditions of appearance. The court rejected the plea as the petitioner was not complying regularly with the order directing daily appearance at the police station.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of July Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL MP(MD) No.5513 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.8046 of 2016
V.DINESH KUMAR ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
Vs
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUNGUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI. CR. NO.128/2016 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditions imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.8046 of 2016 on 25.05.2016.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.D.SELVARAJ, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-
This petition has been filed praying to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.8046 of 2016, dated 25.05.2016, by this Court.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail with certain conditions and the petitioner has been directed to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner is complying with the condition from 08.06.2016.
3.When this petition was taken up for hearing on 11.07.2016, the learned Govt. Advocate submitted that the petitioner has not complied https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ with the condition after 29.06.2016 and at the request of counsel for petitioner, this petition was posted today.
2
4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition from 11.07.2016 to 18.07.2016 and subsequently he did not comply with the said condition.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is not complying with the condition regularly, this Court is not inclined to relax the condition imposed on him and accordingly this petition is dismissed.
sd/-
25/07/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO
ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.5513 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.8046 of 2016 Date :25/07/2016 PA/GSV-PM/SAR I/27.07.2016/2P/6C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condition imposed on the petitioner to appear daily before the police station should be relaxed despite non-compliance.
V. DINESH KUMAR
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUNGUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI
V.M. VELOUMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
