Petitioners sought to relax daily appearance conditions imposed on their anticipatory bail order. The court noted a lapse in compliance and dismissed the petition without relaxing the conditions.
The court did not relax the condition imposed on the petitioners. The petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of July Two Thousand Sixteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI
CRL MP(MD) No.5557 of 2016
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.8276 of 2016
1 SHANMUGA PRIYA
2 ESWARAN
3 PALRAJ
4 RATHINAM ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS
Vs
STATE REB.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SINTHUPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 135 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8276 of 2016 dated 25.05.2016
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S S.MUNIYANDI, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-
This petition has been filed praying to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.8276 of 2016, dated 25.05.2016, by this Court.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been granted anticipatory bail with certain conditions and the petitioners have been directed to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners are complying with the condition from 08.06.2016.
3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that the petitioners are complying with the condition only from 08.06.2016 to 05.07.2016 and thereafter they have not complied with the condition.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ considering the fact that the petitioners are complying with the condition only from 08.06.2016 to 05.07.2016 and thereafter they
have not complied with the condition, this Court is not inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners and accordingly this petition is dismissed.
ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.5557 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.8276 of 2016 Date :25/07/2016 SDR/SKS-RR/SAR I/28.07.2016/2P/5C
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condition of daily appearance imposed on the petitioners under anticipatory bail order can be relaxed.
Whether the failure to comply with bail conditions after a specific date warrants dismissing the petition to relax them.
SHANMUGA PRIYA
ESWARAN
PALRAJ
RATHINAM
STATE
V.M.VELUMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
