Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging violation of a previous writ order. The respondent counsel stated compliance and the petitioner acceded. The court closed the petition without detailed reasoning.
None. Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.09.2016
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
Contempt Petition No.1763 of 2016
R.Devaraj ... Petitioner Vs.
Mr.V.Manivannan, The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Saidapet Branch at Nandanam, Branch Code No.0912, Periyar Building, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-35. ... Respondent
This Contempt Petition is filed to punish the respondent herein under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for having violated the order in W.P.No.6815/2016 dated 07.03.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Yuvaraj For Respondent : Mr.Elayarajkumar for M/s.Ramalingam Associates
O R D E R
Alleging the violation of the orders of this Court made in W.P.No.6815/2016, dated 07.03.2016, thereby directing the respondent to consider the representation of
the petitioner dated 28.01.2016, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order, the present contempt petition is laid.
the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Bank would
2
submit that the order of this Court has been complied with. Therefore, nothing survives in this petition.
accede to the same.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Devaraj
Mr. V. Manivannan
R. Subbiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
