Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking regularization of services. The court records an endorsement under which the petitioner withdraws the petition, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.09.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
W.P.No.21199 of 2014 And
M.P.No.1 of 2014
M.A.Harshad
... Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondents
Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to regularize the services of the Petitioner from the date of his initial appointment with all attendant service and monetary benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vinodh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Venkatesh Government Advocate Mr.R.Lakshmi Narayanan
2
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
14.09.2016
pri Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No
Note: Issue order copy on 14.09.2016
To
3
R.SUBBIAH,J.
pri
W.P.No.21199 of 2014 And M.P.No.1 of 2014
14.09.2016
M.A. Harshad
Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu
Director of Town Panchayats, Kuralagam
Assistant Director of Town Panchayat, Ooty
Executive Officer, Devarsolai Town Panchayat
R. Subbiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
