The court considered a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of an interim stay order. The Government Advocate submitted that proceedings were immediately stopped upon notice. The court found the impugned order followed and closed the petition.
Contempt petition ordered to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.09.2016
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
Contempt Petition No.1522 of 2016
Sangeetha @ Anbe Sangeetha ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.S.Sakthivel,
District Registrar, Puducherry.
2.U.Sekar,
Sub-Registrar,
Pondicherry. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Court Act, 70/71 to punish the respondents for willful
disobedience of the order passed by this Court in
W.M.P.No.10020 of 2016 in W.P.No.11617 of 2016, dated
29.03.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari
For Respondents : Mr.A.Tamilvanan, GA (P)
* * * * *
ORDER
The petitioner herein has filed a writ petition in W.P.No.11617 of 2016 challenging the order of the 1st respondent in his proceedings DRP.No.3/2016, dated
04.03.2016 and along with the writ petition, the petitioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
has filed a miscellaneous petition in W.M.P.No.10020 of
2
2016 seeking interim stay. On 29.03.2016, this Court has granted interim stay of the operation of the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent.
2.Now, the petitioner has filed the present Contempt Petition, alleging that the respondents have disobeyed the order of this Court.
3.Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Advocate (P) submitted that after taking notice of the interim order of this Court, all further proceedings were immediately stopped by the 1st respondent in respect of the impugned proceedings. The respondents have not violated the order of this Court. The order of this court has been complied with by the respondents.
by the respondents, now nothing survives in the present
contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition is ordered to be closed.
Dated at Madras this the day of 2017.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
SS/CO/02/01/2017
3
To
1.S.Sakthivel, District Registrar, Puducherry.
2.U.Sekar, Sub-Registrar, Pondicherry.
one cc to the Govt.Pleader, High Court,sr.No.11966/16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents willfully disobeyed the interim stay order granted by this Court in W.P.No.11617 of 2016.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sangeetha @ Anbe Sangeetha
S.Sakthivel
U.Sekar
R. Subbiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
