Disposed

M. Narayanan v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC16 Jun 2015WP(MD)/9682/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed the Secretary to Government, Public Health Department, to consider the petitioners' representations and pass appropriate orders within three months after an opportunity of being heard, disposing of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

First respondent directed to consider representations and pass orders within three months of receipt after opportunity of hearing.

M. Narayanan Vs the Secretary to Government — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.06.2015

¶4

Coram

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.9682 of 2015

¶7

1.M.Narayanan 2.R.Marimuthu 3.E.Balakrishnan 4.S.Muthuramasamy 5.P.Muthupandi 6.G.Paramasivam

¶8

7.M.Bose 8.S.Suddhanandam : Petitioner

¶9

vs.

¶10

1.The Secretary to Government, Public Health Department, Secretariat, Cennai-600 009.

¶11

2.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, DMS Complex, Thenampet, Chennai – 600 006. : Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent i.e., The secretary to Government, Public Health Department, Chennai to pass appropriate orders on the petitioners representations dated 27.4.2015, 29.04.2015 & 04.05.2015 based on the orders dated 25.02.2015 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and earlier orders passed by the Government in G.O. (D) No.359, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 26.04.2004 within a specified time frame that may be fixed by this Hon'ble High Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Visvalingam For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss Government Advocate

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent i.e., The secretary to Government, Public Health Department, Chennai to pass appropriate orders on the petitioners representations dated 27.4.2015, 29.04.2015 & 04.05.2015 based on the orders dated 25.02.2015 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ earlier orders passed by the Government in G.O. (D) No.359, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 26.04.2004 within a specified time.

¶16

¶17

2.Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents and by consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶18

3.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners

¶19

submitted that it would be suffice if the representation of the petitioner is disposed of, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶20

4.In view of the limited scope of the prayer, without expressing

¶21

any opinion on the merits of the issue involved, the first respondent is directed to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 27.4.2015, 29.04.2015 and 04.05.2015 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording the petitioners an opportunity of being heard. If on a specified date the petitioners do not appear for personal hearing, orders may be passed based on the available records after recording the absence of the Party/Parties.

¶22

5.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side)

¶25

\True copy\

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

¶28

1.The Secretary to Government,

¶29

Public Health Department, Secretariat, Cennai-600 009.

¶30

2.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, DMS Complex, Thenampet, Chennai – 600 006.

¶31

+1cc to Mr.S.Visvalingam, Advocate Sr.No.31057

¶32

+1cc to The Spl.Govt.Pleader, SR.No.31370

¶33

srm

¶34

akm/02.07.15 /2p-5c/

¶35

W.P.(MD)No.9682 of 2015 16.06.2015

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M. Narayanan v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M. Narayanan v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Punitha Lucas Vs the District Eudcational

N. Saravanakumar, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

A.Alagar, Vs the Principal Secretary to

P.Muthusamy Vs the Branch Manager

S. Ganapathy Subramanian Vs the Commissioner of Police

K.Dharmendiran, Vs the District Collector