A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a Charge Memo was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2015
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
WRIT PETITION (MD) No.9514 of 2015
N.Saravanakumar
... Petitioner
-vs-
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, calling for for records of the Impugned Charge Memo issued by the 2nd Respondent under Rule 17(b) of Tamil Nadu Civil Service Discipline and Appeal Rule in his Proceedings CD2/16647/2014-III dated 30.10.2014 and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Viralinathan For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandha Raj Govt. Advocate
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and to that effect, he has also made an endorsement.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AS)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
+1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.31248 ar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
AA/13.07.2015/ 1p- 4c/ WRIT PETITION (MD) No.9514 of 2015 15.06.2015
N.Saravanakumar
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Principal Secretary / Commissioner, Commercial Taxes
S.Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
