Disposed

P. Prakash v. the Regional Join Registrar of

Madras HC17 Jun 2015WP(MD)/9616/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC, the court directed the third respondent to expedite the police enquiry and register an FIR if a cognizable offence was made out, relying on Lalitha Kumari, while also directing the petitioner to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Directed the third respondent to expedite the enquiry and register a case if a cognizable offence is made out; directed the petitioner to cooperate.

P. Prakash Vs the Regional Join Registrar of — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Original Petition (MD) No.15933 of 2015

¶5

S.A.Jesuraja ... Petitioner

¶6

¶7

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

¶8

2.The Deputy Superintedent of Police, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram Districgt.

¶9

3.The Inspector of Police, Parthibanoor Police Station, Parthibanoor, Ramanathapuram District. ...Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., directing the third respondent to register the FIR in the complaint of the Petitioner dated 14.7.2015 and act in accordance with law.

¶11

For Petitioner : M/s.M.Boopathy Pandiyan For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Govt. Advocate(Crl. Side)

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, directing the third respondent to register the FIR in the complaint of the Petitioner dated 14.7.2015 and act in accordance with law.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the third respondent as early as on 14.07.2015, but, however, the third respondent police had not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief.

¶15

3.At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that the Petition enquiry is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ pending in C.S.R.No.192 of 2015 and that the Petitioner has not co-operated with the respondents Police for enquiry.

¶16

¶17

Considering the rival submission made on both sides, the third respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and follow the dictum laid down in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC) and register a case, if any cognizable offence is made out. The Petitioner is also directed to cooperate with the respondents Police for enquiry.

¶18

The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above directions.

¶19

SD/-

¶20

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CRL.SIDE)

¶21

/TRUE COPY/

¶22

SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶23

vsn

¶24

¶25

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

¶26

2.The Deputy Superintedent of Police, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram Districgt.

¶27

3.The Inspector of Police, Parthibanoor Police Station, Parthibanoor, Ramanathapuram District.

¶28

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

+1CC TO MR.M.BOOPATHI PANDIYAN, ADVOCATE, SR NO:47223 JAM/GSV-PM/SAR-J/8.9.15/2P-6C

¶30

Crl.O.P(MD)No.15933 of 2015 18.08.2015

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P. Prakash v. the Regional Join Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Prakash v. the Regional Join Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Muthusamy Vs the Branch Manager

S. Ganapathy Subramanian Vs the Commissioner of Police

M. Narayanan Vs the Secretary to Government

K.Dharmendiran, Vs the District Collector

R. Govindaraju Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

M.Logendran Vs the Government of Tamilnadu