Disposed

R. Ramanathan v. the Commissioner of Rural

Madras HC20 Feb 2015WP(MD)/2227/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition seeks a mandamus for the regularisation of the petitioner's post as Deputy Block Development Officer. The Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representations and decide on the merits within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Collector to consider the petitioner's representations and pass appropriate orders on merits within eight weeks.

R. Ramanathan Vs the Commissioner of Rural — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.02.2015

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶5

Writ Petition (MD) No.2227 of 2015

¶6

R.Ramanathan

¶7

... Petitioner Vs.

¶8

1.The Commissioner of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Chennai.

¶9

2.The District Collector (Development Division), Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents

¶10

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus , directing the District Collector (Development Division), Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli, the second respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 06.01.2015 and 13.02.2015 and declare completion of probation and regularisation of the post of Deputy Block Development Officer held by the petitioner with effect from 05.07.2010 and refix the seniority for the post of Deputy Block Development Officers in Tirunelveli District and further transfer the petitioner to the post of Deputy Block Development Officer (Panchayats).

¶11

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.Muruganandam,

¶12

Additional Government Pleader.

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the second respondent herein to consider his representations dated 06.01.2015 and 13.02.2015 and declare completion of probation and regularisation of the post of Deputy Block Development Officer held by the petitioner with effect from 05.07.2010 and refix the seniority for the post of Deputy Block Development Officer and further transfer the petitioner to the post of Deputy Block Development Officer (Panchayats).

¶15

2.It is seen that through the above said representations, the petitioner seeks for declaration of completion of his probation and regularisation of the post of Deputy Block Development Officer with other service benefits.

¶16

3.Needless to say that it is for the second respondent to consider those representations and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law as this Court at this stage is not expressing any https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ view on the merits and contentions raised by the writ petitioner.

¶17

¶18

4.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of only with a direction to the second respondent to consider those representations of the petitioner dated 06.01.2015 and 13.02.2015 and pass appropriate orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶19

Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True Copy/ Sub- Assistant Registrar

¶20

¶21

1.The Commissioner of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Chennai.

¶22

2.The District Collector (Development Division), Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶23

+1cc to M/r.Y.Prakash, Advocate, SR.No.8525/15

¶24

+1cc special government pleader SR.No.8094

¶25

Sms

¶26

sm:27.02.2015:2P/5C

¶27

Writ Petition (MD) No.2227 of 2015 20.02.2015

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R. Ramanathan v. the Commissioner of Rural

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Ramanathan v. the Commissioner of Rural

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.M. Jayakumar, Vs the Regional Transport

D.Mathivanan Vs the Regional Transport

G. Pandiarajan, Vs the Chairman

T.Vaikundamani, Vs the Director

G. Ponnammal, Vs the District Collector

S.Chithra Vs the District Collector