The petitioner withdrawn the writ petition seeking quashing of proceedings and direction for second medical board test for police recruitment. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 18.02.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
W.P.(MD)No.784 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013
G.Pandiarajan : Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the second respondent's proceedings in Na.Ka.No.B1/436/2013, dated 04.01.2013 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to undergo 2nd Medical Board Test and on that basis to select and appoint the petitioner for the post of GradeII Police Constable A.R.(Men) in the ongoing combined recruitment of Grade-II Police Constables/Grade-II Jail Warders/Firemen-2012 conducted by the respondents.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vishnu Ram, For Mr.M.Veilkaniraju For Respondents : Mr.S.Kumar, Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement indicating that he is withdrawing the Writ Petition.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(T & P)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
2
To
Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, No.807, P.T.Lee.Chengalvaraya Naicker Maaligai, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.
+1cc to Special Government Pleader, in SR No.7803.
W.P.(MD)No.784 of 2013 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2013 18.02.2015
gcg msm 26.02.2015 p2/4c
G.Pandiarajan
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board
The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City
K.Ravichandrabaabu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
