Writ petition filed by G. Ponnammal under Article 226 was dismissed as withdrawn on the receipt of a requisition letter. No costs awarded.
None granted as the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.02.2015 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
Writ Petition (MD) No.1243 of 2013
G.Ponnammal
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
2.The Tahsildar, Tuticorin Taluk, Tuticorin.
3.Perumal ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.03.2012.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.Muruganandam, Additional Government Pleader. R1 & R2 R3 : No appearance
ORDER
This writ petition is listed today under the caption “for withdrawal” on the basis of letter of requisition given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the Registry.
2.Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (Crl.side)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To 1.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
2.The Tahsildar, Tuticorin Taluk, Tuticorin.
+1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, IN SR : 8093
Sms SR : 16.03.2015 : 1p/4c
Writ Petition (MD) No.1243 of 2013 20.02.2015
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Ponnammal
District Collector, Tuticorin District
Tahsildar, Tuticorin Taluk
Perumal
K. Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court