Writ petition seeking mandamus for the respondent to pass orders on a proposal regarding the regularisation of the petitioner's service as a driver. The High Court directed the respondent to decide within twelve weeks.
Directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the proposal sent by the second respondent within twelve weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
T.Muniyandi
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.02.2015
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
Writ Petition (MD) No.1488 of 2015
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat,
Chennai 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Town and Country Planning, 807, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ...Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent i.e. the secretary to Government Housing and urban Development Department Secretariat Chennai to pass appropriate orders on the proposals sent by the 2nd respondent i.e. the Commissioner of Town and Country Planning Chennai in his ROC No.29546/2005/K2 dated 13.6.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Visvalingam For Respondents :Mr.M.Rajarajan Government Advocate.
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate who takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.
2.The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the proposal sent by the second respondent dated 13.06.2014.
3.The petitioner is working as Jeep driver in the office of the Town and Country Planning, Sivagangai. He seeks permanent absorption in the said post. It is seen that the second respondent through proceedings dated 13.06.2014 addressed the first respondent requesting to issue orders on the regularisation of the petitioner's temporary service in the post of driver with effect from the date of his joining i.e, on 02.11.2001. The grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent has not passed any order on the proposal sent by the second respondent so far.
4.Considering the above said facts and circumstances, the first respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the proposal sent by the second respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ receipt of a copy of this order.
2
5.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(Writs) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Town and Country Planning, 807, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002
+1CC to M/s.S.Visvalingam, Advocate in SR.5543
+1CC to the Special Government Pleader in SR.5894
Writ Petition (MD) No.1488 of 2015 06.02.2015
sms PBK 20/02/2015 ::2P-5C:
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the proposal sent by the second respondent regarding the permanent absorption of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.Muniyandi
The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department
The Commissioner of Town and Country Planning
K.Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court