Disposed

M.C.Jeyapandian v. the Management of

Madras HC6 Feb 2015WP(MD)/1478/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners seeking writ for payment of leave salary with interest filed pending representation with Respondent Corporation. Court directed Respondent to consider representation and decide on merits within four weeks without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to consider pending representation dated 15.09.2014 and pass appropriate orders on merits within four weeks.

M.C.Jeyapandian Vs the Management of — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.02.2015 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Writ Petition (MD) No.1478 of 2015

¶3

1.M.C.Jeyapandian

¶4

2.S.Gopal

¶5

3.A.Rajaram

¶6

4.V.Nagarathinam

¶7

5.P.Veerapathiran

¶8

6.R.Ganesan

¶9

7.P.Gurusamy

¶10

8.S.Rajendran

¶11

9.K.Alagumalai 10.R.Lenin 11.R.Kasirajan 12.A.Vincent 13.S.Venugopal 14.V.Jeyaraman 15.S.Mohammed Bahrudeen

¶12

16.S.Paulpandi 17.C.Palani 18.M.Nagarajan 19.P.Selvaraj 20.B.Lazar 21.M.Thangavelu 22.S.Natarajan 23.R.Ragavan 24.A.Sulthan 25.P.Krishnan 26.M.Manickavasagam 27.N.Ravindran 28.S.Murali 29.S.Savaridass 30.M.Shahul Hameed 31.A.Rajendran 32.P.Muthupandi 33.N.Jeyaraj 34.P.Manmathan 35.V.Poomibalagan 36.S.Rajasekaran 37.A.Pandiyan 38.S.Seenivasan 39.K.Chandrasekaran 40.M.Nawab John 41.S.Kuladairaj 42.K.Thangamuthu 43.M.Thomas 44.P.Senram 45.M.Rajendran 46.S.Pounraj 47.P.Nagusamy https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 48.S.Rayappan 49.S.Nagasundaram

¶13

¶14

50.D.Raguram 51.K.Selvaraj 52.K.Thangavelu 53.D.Varadharaj 54.K.Dhanuskodi 55.R.Manoharan 56.P.Rajendran 57.N.Narayanasamy 58.P.Nagarajan 59.I.Nagarajan ... Petitioners Vs.

¶15

The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul Region, Rep by its General Manager, Dindigul. ... Respondent

¶16

... Respondent

¶17

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay the amounts payable to the petitioners towards Leave Salary together with 18% interest per annum from the dates of their retirement.

¶18

For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondent :Mr.A.P.Muthupandian ORDER

¶19

Mr.A.P.Muthupandian, learned Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶20

2.The petitioners seek for a Mandamus directing the respondent to pay leave salary together with interest payable to the petitioners. All these petitioners were working under the respondent Corporation and retired from service. According to the petitioners, the leave salary was not paid to them which they are otherwise entitled to. As it is not paid, they have filed the present writ petitions before this Court seeking for the relief as stated supra.

¶21

3.It is seen that the grievance of the petitioners were brought to the knowledge of the respondent through representation made on 15.09.2014 and such representation is said to be still pending. Therefore, it is for the respondent to consider the said representation and pass appropriate orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court is not expressing any view on the merits and the claim made by the petitioners at this stage.

¶22

4.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of only with a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 15.09.2014 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶25

/True copy/

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

sms To

¶30

The General Manager, Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul Region, Dindigul.

¶31

+1cc to MR.S.ARUNACHALAM,ADVOCATE IN SR NO.5759

¶32

Writ Petition (MD) No.1478 of 2015 06.02.2015

¶33

rg.19.02.2015 3p.3c.

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.C.Jeyapandian v. the Management of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.C.Jeyapandian v. the Management of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D. Rajan, Vs the District Collector

P.Kanagu Vs the Revenue Divisional

Nallaperumal Vs the Taluk Supply Officer

P. Vijayaraghavan Vs the Joint Registrar/Managing

K.Chockkalingam Vs the Commissioner of Municipal

T. Muniyandi Vs the Secretary to Government